This is not an exhaustive list of all Gaming Decisions in process. It is being continuously being updated as office information is received.
Overview of Gaming Land Eligibility
Indian tribes may only game on Indian lands that are eligible for gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. Such lands must meet the definition of “Indian lands” at 25 U.S.C. § 2703, which requires that the land be within the limits of a tribe’s reservation, be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the tribe or its member(s), or that the land be subject to restrictions against alienation by the United States for the benefit of the tribe or its member(s). Additionally, the tribe must have jurisdiction and exercise governmental powers over the gaming site.
The IGRA, 25 U.S.C. § 2719, contains a general prohibition against gaming on lands acquired into trust after October 17, 1988 (the date the IGRA was enacted into law). Tribes may game on such after-acquired trust land if the land meets one of the exceptions laid out in § 2719. Below are the fee-to-trust decisions and two-part secretarial determinations issued by the Department for after-acquired land for gaming.
Displaying 26 - 50 of 139
| US State(s) | Tribe(s) | Title | Legal Theory | Decision Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians, California |
Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| California | Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California |
Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians Decision |
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Approved | |
| California | Guidiville Rancheria of California |
Guidiville Rancheria of California Decision |
Restored Lands | Disapproved | |
| California | Elk Valley Rancheria, California |
Elk Valley Rancheria Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| California | Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California |
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| California | Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation, California |
Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Decision |
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Disapproved | |
| California | Big Lagoon Rancheria, California |
Big Lagoon Rancheria Decision |
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Disapproved | |
| California | Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California |
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Decision |
Within or Contiguous to Reservation Boundaries | Approved | |
| California | Koi Nation of Northern California |
Koi Nation of Northern California Shiloh Resort and Casino ProjectThe Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to analyze the potential environmental consequences of the Koi Nation of Northern California’s (Koi Nation) proposed fee-to-trust transfer of an approximately 68.6-acre parcel in unincorporated Sonoma County, California, adjacent to the Town of Windsor, for gaming purposes (Proposed Action). The Proposed Project includes the development of a casino, hotel, conference/event center, restaurant/bars, and supporting parking and infrastructure within the project site. The federal actions necessary to implement the Proposed Project trigger the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The BIA is the Lead Agency for compliance with NEPA. The BIA previously conducted scoping and prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) that analyzed the potential environmental effects of the proposed action. The EA was made available for public comments and was the subject of a public meeting. Upon consideration of the public and agency comments received, prepared an EIS to further analyze the environmental effects which may result from the proposed action. A Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS was issued on March 8, 2024. A Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS was issued on July 8, 2024, advising the public that the BIA filed the Draft EIS with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in connection with the Proposed Action. Publication of Notice of Availability by the EPA in the Federal Register on July 12, 2024, officially initiated a 45-day comment period on the Draft EIS that concluded on August 26, 2024. A virtual public hearing was held on July 30, 2024. The BIA reviewed the comments received on the Draft EIS and prepared a Final EIS, which includes responses to the comments received on the Draft EIS (Appendix P of the Final EIS). The Notice of Availability of the Final EIS was published in the Federal Register on November 22, 2024. The Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs made a final agency determination to acquire the 68.6-acre property into federal trust for the Koi Nation for gaming and other purposes on January 13, 2025, and subsequently issued a Record of Decision, which was made available on this website on January 17, 2025. On September 30, 2025, the United States District Court for the District of Northern California, declared the Department of the Interior's (Department) January 13, 2025, decision to acquire in trust 68.60 acres, more or less, of land known as the Shiloh Parcel in Sonoma County, California, for the Koi Nation of Northern California for gaming and other purposes, invalid and vacated the subsequent trust land acquisition announced in the Federal Register on January 17, 2025, 90 FR 5980. FINAL JUDGMENT, ECF No. 155, Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. No. 3:24-cv-8582 (N.D. Cal 2025). Consistent with that order, the Department has removed the 68.60 acres, more or less, of land known as the Shiloh Parcel in Sonoma County, California, from trust status and reconveying all right, title and interest in the property back to Sonoma Rose LLC., in fee simple. The Department announced the Reversal of Land Acquisition on April 2, 2026, 91 FR 16721. |
Restored Lands | Pending | |
| California | Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California |
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Reconsideration DecisionReconsideration decision of the May 25, 2012 decision. |
Restored Lands | Disapproved | |
| California | Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California |
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians DecisionReconsideration requested. See September 19, 2013 Decision. |
Restored Lands | Disapproved | |
| California | Tejon Indian Tribe |
Tejon Indian Tribe Two-Part Secretarial Determination
|
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Approved | |
| Connecticut | Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut |
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut Decision |
Initial Reservation | Approved | |
| Indiana | Miami Tribe of Oklahoma |
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Decision |
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Disapproved | |
| Indiana | Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana |
Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and Indiana Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| Kansas | Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas |
Kickapoo Tribe of Indian of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas Decision |
Within or Contiguous to Reservation Boundaries | Disapproved | |
| Kansas | Wyandotte Nation |
Wyandotte Tribe of Oklahoma Decision |
Within or Contiguous to Reservation Boundaries | Approved | |
| Louisiana | Tonawanda Band of Seneca |
Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe Decision |
Within or Contiguous to Reservation Boundaries | Approved | |
| Massachusetts | Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe |
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe DecisionAffirming September 18, 2015 decision following litigation in Littlefieldv. United States Dep 't of Interior, 199 F. Supp. 3d 391, 396 (D. Mass. 2016), aff'd sub nom. Littlefield v. Mashpee Wampanoag Indian Tribe, 951 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2020). |
Initial Reservation | Approved | |
| Michigan | Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan |
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians Decision |
Initial Reservation | Approved | |
| Michigan | Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan |
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community DecisionThe Department approved the application in 2011. In 2013, the Governor of Michigan did not concur.
|
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Approved | |
| Michigan | Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan |
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| Michigan | Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Michigan |
Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Decision |
Restored Lands | Approved | |
| Michigan | Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan |
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe Decision |
Within or Contiguous to Reservation Boundaries | Approved | |
| Michigan | Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan |
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community DecisionDepartmental approval May 9, 2000; Governor's Concurrence November 7, 2000. |
Two-Part Secretarial Determination | Approved |
Contact Us
MS-3543-MIB
Washington, DC 20240